What You Need to Know about Sharing the Gospel

5/22/21

I’ll be connecting three overarching worldviews with three models of atonement. This will be extremely helpful to any Christian who wants to put the Gospel into cultural context to any major people group, ranging from three geographical areas (the Americas, Africa, and Asia).

Overarching Worldviews

There are three predominant worldviews that cultures have embraced due to the consequences of the Fall from perfection in the Garden of Eden: (1) Fear vs. Power; (2) Guilt vs. Innocence; and (3) Shame vs. Honor.

Fear vs. Power: Many African cultures and some Asian and South American cultures, which are more animistic, emphasize the natural desire for protection and prosperity by seeking divine power to combat the demonic power of fear. These cultures invoke charms, sacrifices, and spirit worship to shield them from angry (dead) ancestors and/or provoked spirits. Accordingly, the world is carved up into two realms—the physical and the spiritual, with the spiritual having power over the physical. Superstition regulates how people remain on the good side of the spirits.

Guilt vs. Innocence: In most western cultures, the focus of humanity centers not so much on the power struggle between theological concepts of good and evil, but on legal terms regarding rightness and wrongness, such as innocence and guilt. The individual is determined innocent by keeping the law, and by breaking the law, s/he is determined guilty, which demands punishment. The focus here is on individual rights and freedoms, which enable the person to reach his/her potential.

Shame vs. Honor: Eastern cultures from Asia, the Middle East, and South America emphasize the honor of the collective and not so much the individual as does the west. Honor to the group is maintained at whatever cost in order to avoid shaming the family, tribe, or clan, which typically results in shunning the sinner. Individual achievements and accomplishments, however, contribute to the honor of the group. Life comes down to connection and contribution to the group.

Summary:

“Adam and Eve began their lives innocent, unashamed and fearless in their relationship with God. The moment they ate the [forbidden] fruit the world turned upside down; from being innocent, they became guilty of breaking God’s command; from being unashamed, they became ashamed of their nakedness and tried to hide it; from being fear-less, they became fear-full, hiding from God when he came into the garden. For God, he saw his beloved creation fall into chaos. Guilt brought punishment. Shame brought rejection. Fear was joined by condemnation brought about by the judgment God pronounced. Yet, through all this, God did not withdraw his love from his creation.” “Guilt, Shame and Power: Worldviews and the Gospel,” Power to Change (2014), pg. 1.

Atonement Models

By the biblical-theological term “atonement,” I’m referring to a sacrifice that makes reconciliation to God possible. For all intents and purposes, atonement can be construed creatively as a sinner being at-one-ment with God the Father through His Son, Jesus Christ.

There are a handful of atonement models that all Christians should be familiar with, such as Christus Victor, Satisfaction, Penal Substitution, Recapitulation, Moral Influence, Ransom, Governmental, and Scapegoat. I’d like to show how the first three fit or connect—hand-in-glove—to the three anthropological worldviews previously discussed.

Christus Victor and Power

On the cross, Christ’s death defeated the powers of Satan and all evil. This spiritual warfare motif illustrates that through Christ’s victory all things have been reconciled to God. Human beings are thus set free from the bondage of sin.

  • —“Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might break the power of him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil…” Hebrews 2:14, NIV
  • —“The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.” 1 John 3:8, NIV
  • —“Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their wrongdoings against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.” 2 Corinthians 5:18-19
  • —“…and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross. And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight…” Colossians 1:20-22, NKJV
  • —“For we know that our old self was crucified with him so that the body ruled by sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin—because anyone who has died has been set free from sin.” Romans 6:6-7, NIV

The Satisfaction Model and Honor

In the Middle Ages, with the cultural milieu of feudal obligation for vassals to pay honor to their lords, the human predicament of sin before God was seen as humans/vassals failing to pay honor due to their Lord/landlord. God’s honor could only be satisfied or restored if “the debt of honour were paid—either by compensation or by penalty inflicted.”[1] And because an infinite God had been dishonoured by finite creatures God could not be satisfied by their penalty. Enter Jesus Christ—the God-man. St. Anselm writes that “none but God can make [atonement for sin] and none but man ought to make [it], [thus] it is necessary for the God-man to make it” (emphases mine);[2] hence, the title of his magnum opus, Cur Deus Homo (“Why Did God Become Human?”). Stephen D. Morrison sums up Anselm’s Satisfaction theory by saying, “Jesus Christ died in order to pay back the injustice of human sin and to satisfy the justice of God.”[3]

  • —“In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.” Hebrews 9:22, NIV
  • —“…we have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” Hebrews 10:10, NIV
  • —“God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished—he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.” Romans 3:25-26, NIV

The Penal Substitution Model and Innocence

A cultural paradigm shift resulted from the time of the Middle Ages to the Protestant Reformation. The cultural milieu went from a feudal system of government to a criminal justice system. And thus, the feudal system of restoring a debt of honor either by compensation or penalty inflicted became the legal system of restoring a (legal) debt satisfying the wrath of God by penalty only. Paul S. Fiddes comments on the Creator-creature estrangement: “[The predicament] was understood in terms of there being law-breakers, summoned to receive condemnation at the divine bar of justice. Atonement, correspondingly, was a matter of satisfying not so much the honour of God as the demands of his Law, with Jesus punished as a substitute for guilty humankind.”[4]

  • —“All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the Lordhas laid on him the iniquity of us all.” Isaiah 53:6, ESV
  • —“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us—for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree’…” Galatians 3:13, ESV
  • —“For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” 2 Corinthians 5:21, ESV
  • —“He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.” 1 John 2:2, ESV
  • —“For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit…” 1 Peter 3:18, ESV
  • —“And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.” Colossians 2:13-15, ESV

Conclusion:

Every human being is affected or influenced in some way by each of the overarching worldviews. But depending on culture, one particular worldview becomes more prominent than the other. It would be prudent, therefore, if we’re sharing the Gospel with a person or group of people from a certain geographical area, to “speak the Gospel in their language” or to contextualize the message of salvation so it resonates most clearly and powerfully with its audience.

  • —To Africans I recommend illustrating Christ’s atonement by concentrating on the power of God to protect and provide for them by sharing the Christus Victor model. Here are some songs that conveys that message: Break Every Chain, Death Has Lost Its Sting 
  • —To Asiatics and Middle Easterners I recommend sharing God’s righteous act of justification by emphasizing terms, such as honor, majesty, kingship and justice, found in the Satisfaction model. Here are some songs that conveys that message: King Jesus, I Give You My Heart,
  • —To Westerners I recommend telling God’s love story for humanity in legal terms by using the Penal Substitutionary Atonement model. Here are some songs that conveys that message: His Robes for Mine, Hallelujah, What a Savior 

_____________________

[1] Paul S. Fiddes, Past Event and Present Salvation: The Christian Idea of Atonement (Louisville, KT: John Knox Press, 1989), 8.

[2] Anselm, Cur Deus Homo, 2.6.

[3] Stephen D. Morrison, “Seven Theories of the Atonement Summarized,” https://www.sdmorrison.org/7-theories-of-the-atonement-summarized/ (accessed May 22, 2021).

[4] Fiddes, Past Event and Present Salvation, 9.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

5/22/21

Learn to contextualize the Gospel for anyone God puts in your life.

Read More »

4/24/21

Observations within Christian subculture in South Orange County. What does Jesus and SOC have in common?

Read More »

4/9/21

Engage the contemporary culture with Christian apologetics and aesthetics!

Read More »

Newsletter Signup